Proven Track Record for Thousands of Clients | Pay Nothing Unless You Win

Levin Law, PLLC

Levin Law, PLLCLevin Law, PLLCLevin Law, PLLC

Levin Law, PLLC

Levin Law, PLLCLevin Law, PLLCLevin Law, PLLC
  • Home
  • About
  • Cases
    • Retirement Plan Claims
    • Investor Rights
    • Wage Violations
    • Data Breaches
    • Whistleblowers
  • FAQ's
  • Contact
  • More
    • Home
    • About
    • Cases
      • Retirement Plan Claims
      • Investor Rights
      • Wage Violations
      • Data Breaches
      • Whistleblowers
    • FAQ's
    • Contact
  • Home
  • About
  • Cases
    • Retirement Plan Claims
    • Investor Rights
    • Wage Violations
    • Data Breaches
    • Whistleblowers
  • FAQ's
  • Contact

TOBACCO & SMOKER SURCHARGES

Find out if you qualify to claim

Were You Charged a Tobacco or “Smoker’s” Surcharge?

Tobacco Users Overcharged for Health Insurance

You may have paid more for health insurance than the law allows.

Many employers charge employees extra for health insurance if they use tobacco. These charges are often called tobacco surcharges, smoker’s surcharges, or wellness program penalties.


Under federal law, employers and health plans cannot simply charge higher premiums based on tobacco use unless they follow strict rules. When they fail to follow those rules, employees may be entitled to money back.

Find Out If You Qualify

Contact us to find out if you qualify to receive compensation.

Find out NOW

Compensation You May Be Eligible To Receive

Depending on the facts, affected employees may be able to seek:

  • Refunds of improperly charged tobacco surcharges.
  • Reimbursement for amounts paid during the plan year.
  • Other relief available under federal employee benefits law.
  • The amount may depend on how much you paid, how long you paid it, and whether your employer followed the wellness program rules.

What Is a Tobacco Surcharge?

Tobacco Surcharge Explained

A tobacco surcharge is an extra amount added to an employee’s health insurance premium because the employee uses tobacco.


These surcharges can be significant. Employees may pay hundreds of dollars more per year for health insurance coverage.


Employers often include these charges as part of a workplace “wellness program.” But wellness programs must comply with federal rules.


When a Tobacco Surcharge May Be Illegal

A tobacco surcharge may violate the law if your employer or health plan failed to follow the required rules.

Your Rights Under Federal Law

Federal law generally prohibits health plans from charging employees different premiums based on a health factor, including tobacco use.

There is an exception for certain wellness programs, but only if the program gives tobacco users a fair chance to avoid the surcharge. That usually means the employer must offer a reasonable alternative, such as completing a tobacco cessation program.

When You May Have a Claim

  • You paid extra for health insurance because of tobacco use.
  • You were told you had to pay a smoker’s or tobacco surcharge.
  • You were not clearly told how to avoid the surcharge.
  • You completed a tobacco cessation program but did not receive a full refund.
  • You were given an unrealistic deadline to complete the tobacco cessation program.
  • You paid the surcharge even though the wellness program rules were unclear or confusing.

Common Violations

You Were Not Given the “Full Reward”

If non-tobacco users avoided the surcharge for the entire year, tobacco users who completed the required alternative program may also be entitled to the same full benefit.


Employees should receive a retroactive refund of tobacco surcharges paid earlier in the year after completing the alternative requirement.


The Deadline Was Too Restrictive

Some plans require employees to enroll in or complete a tobacco cessation program by a specific deadline.


If the deadline was too short or difficult to meet, the alternative standard was not truly reasonable.


The Plan Did Not Clearly Explain the Alternative

Employers must clearly tell employees that a reasonable alternative is available.


Plan materials may be legally deficient if they mention the tobacco surcharge but fail to explain that employees can avoid the surcharge by completing an alternative requirement.


The Employer Kept Improper Surcharge Money

Sometimes employers breach their duties by collecting tobacco surcharges improperly or keeping those amounts for their own benefit instead of handling them properly under the health plan.

A Legacy of Success

Together with our co-counsel, we've jointly represented thousands of employees nationwide in their pursuit of Justice and Accountability.  


Contact us to find out if you qualify.

Find out NOW

Submit your Information Securely

Click to Upload Documents
Attachments (0)

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship. Levin Law, PLLC represents clients nationwide; however, we do not represent clients in certain states and our representation may be limited to federal practice in others. We assume joint responsibility for cases with co-counsel and associate with local counsel where required and/or our clients' best interests dictate such an arrangement.


2000 West Loop South  |  Suite 2200  |  Houston, Texas 77027  |  (888) 935-2929  

  • Home
  • About
  • Retirement Plan Claims
  • Investor Rights
  • Wage Violations
  • Data Breaches
  • Whistleblowers
  • FAQ's
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

© 2026 Levin Law, PLLC | All Rights Reserved

Welcome!

By providing your contact information you confirm you have read and agree to Levin Law, PLLC’s Privacy Policy. You agree to receive phone calls, SMS text messages, and emails from Levin and/or our agents. You agree to receive up to 5 automated promotional SMS texts and electronic newsletters per month. You understand you can reply STOP to unsubscribe, and that message and data rates may apply. You acknowledge this site uses cookies. You understand use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship.

I agree